Security researchers have uncovered a sophisticated software supply-chain operation behind the Contagious Interview campaign, a threat targeting developers who depend on NPM packages. The attackers are running what resembles a “full stack” development and delivery pipeline, complete with code hosting, package distribution, staging servers, and command-and-control (C2) infrastructure.
Instead of a loose, ad hoc malware operation, this campaign mirrors legitimate engineering workflows, making it harder for developers to distinguish malicious activity from normal package use. This design significantly raises the stakes for anyone routinely installing third-party dependencies in JavaScript and Node.js projects.
A Full Stack Supply Chain Attack
Researchers report that the latest wave of the campaign involved nearly 200 newly uploaded malicious NPM packages, collectively recording tens of thousands of downloads. These packages are woven into a broader operation that spans the entire supply chain, from registry publication to C2 communication.
At a high level, the attackers have structured their infrastructure the way modern engineering teams run their own pipelines: malicious code is hosted, distributed, staged, and delivered via coordinated services, making the attack feel like a normal dependency workflow until the payload activates.
Social Engineering via Fake Coding Interviews
The Contagious Interview campaign begins not with a technical exploit, but with social engineering. Victims are approached with fake job interview opportunities, often framed around Web3 or blockchain projects. As part of a “technical assignment,” they are asked to clone a test project and install specific dependencies.
Hidden inside that dependency list are Trojanized NPM packages. On the surface, the packages appear to be legitimate utilities, but they contain concealed payloads that only reveal themselves after installation. This blend of career opportunity and technical tasks makes the lure particularly convincing for developers seeking new roles.
Trojanized NPM Packages and Payload Delivery
The attackers exploit NPM’s popularity among JavaScript and Node.js developers by publishing packages that mimic real tools, sometimes using typosquatting to trick users. In one documented case, a malicious package named “tailwind-magic” imitates a legitimate library by closely copying the name of an established utility.
Once a developer installs a compromised package, a post-install script silently executes in the background. That script connects to a staging endpoint hosted on a modern cloud platform, which then retrieves a live payload from a threat-controlled Git repository. The malware—an evolved variant combining features from known payload families—is then launched and links back to the attackers’ control infrastructure.
Credential Theft, Monitoring, and Remote Access
The final payload in this campaign is designed to give attackers broad visibility and control over the victim’s environment. After establishing a remote connection to the C2 server, the malware begins quietly harvesting sensitive data from the compromised machine.
Targets include developer credentials, browser data, crypto wallets, and system information, as well as other artifacts that can be used to pivot into additional accounts or services. With expanded monitoring and remote access capabilities, the attackers can effectively take over developer workstations and associated accounts, turning trusted contributors into unknowing footholds inside wider ecosystems.
Point Defense: Treat Every Install as Risky
Security teams advise that defending against this kind of operation starts with rethinking how dependencies are handled. The safest posture is to treat every npm install as a potential remote code execution event, not just a harmless package fetch. This mindset shift encourages more scrutiny and tighter controls.
Practical steps include restricting what continuous integration (CI) runners can access, enforcing strict network egress rules, and reviewing code for any new templates, starter kits, or utility scripts pulled from public repositories. Staying disciplined about dependency hygiene dramatically reduces the attackers’ room to maneuver.
Hardening Dependency and CI Pipelines
To shrink the attack surface, teams should pay close attention to any unfamiliar helper packages introduced into projects. Pinning known-good versions and relying on lockfiles rather than automatic dependency updates can help avoid inadvertently pulling in compromised releases.
Automated package analysis tools can further reduce risk by scanning dependencies in real time for suspicious behaviors such as import-time execution, unexpected network calls, or bulk data collection. When combined with tight review practices, this turns dependency onboarding into a strong filter rather than a blind trust step.
Why These Defenses Work
These defensive practices are effective because the campaign’s primary entry point is human, not purely technical. The attackers rely on the credibility of interview scenarios and coding tasks to convince developers to run the malicious packages themselves.
By inserting structured review, automation, and network controls into the pipeline, teams can break that chain. Even if a developer is socially engineered into cloning a repository, strict controls around outbound connections, package behavior, and CI permissions can stop the payload from successfully reaching its staging endpoint or C2 infrastructure.
Building a More Resilient Engineering Culture
Ultimately, defending against full stack supply chain campaigns like Contagious Interview requires a mix of technical safeguards and cultural awareness. Engineering teams need to recognize that interview tasks and sample projects are not automatically safe just because they are framed as professional opportunities.
By combining dependency hygiene, automated analysis, least-privilege CI configurations, and a healthy skepticism toward unvetted packages, organizations can significantly lower the risk of compromise. In an ecosystem where attackers increasingly adopt full stack development practices themselves, only equally disciplined security habits will keep developer environments—and the software they ship—out of harm’s way.
Read more such articles from our Newsletter here.
