Introduction to Microservices and Data Challenges

Microservices architecture has revolutionized software development by dividing applications into smaller, independent services. This approach enhances modularity, scalability, and ease of maintenance. Each microservice usually maintains its own isolated database, ensuring loose coupling and allowing teams to evolve their data models independently. However, this isolation introduces significant challenges when services need to access or combine data across boundaries.

Traditionally, microservices rely on APIs or message queues for inter-service communication. While these methods enforce loose coupling, they also increase complexity. Services must independently handle tasks such as combining data from multiple sources or maintaining local copies of external data. This often results in inconsistencies, latency issues, and duplicated development efforts.

Challenges of Traditional Microservices Data Access

Microservices typically use lightweight protocols like REST APIs, gRPC, or messaging systems to maintain loose coupling. Each service manages its own database internally, providing data access exclusively through defined interfaces. This design allows teams to freely adapt internal structures without affecting external consumers.

However, this isolation complicates scenarios where services require cross-service data access. For example, in an e-commerce application, an order service may need real-time inventory data to confirm stock availability before processing payments. In a monolithic system with a single database, this task is straightforward—simply joining tables within the same database. In contrast, microservices must either:

• Query external services via APIs (introducing latency and potential inconsistencies).
• Consume event streams from message queues (requiring local state reconstruction).

Both approaches add complexity and overhead. API calls can become slow or asynchronous, leading to outdated results by the time responses are combined. Message queue consumption requires each service to independently implement state management logic—duplicating effort and increasing complexity.

Exploring Centralized Databases for Microservices

A potential solution is introducing a shared database for cross-service queries. This approach simplifies interactions by making data from multiple services immediately accessible via SQL queries. Complex operations like joins and aggregations across different services become straightforward SQL operations.

Yet conventional wisdom discourages shared databases due to tight coupling risks and resource contention concerns. Exposing internal schemas directly can break queries whenever schema changes occur—hampering agility. Additionally, shared databases risk performance bottlenecks since poorly optimized queries can degrade overall system performance.

Mitigating Shared Database Challenges with Database Views

To address schema-change issues while maintaining agility, teams can leverage database views as stable interfaces between services. A view is essentially a named query that abstracts underlying schema details from external consumers. Internal schema changes remain hidden behind view definitions; external teams continue querying stable interfaces without disruption.

For example, if an inventory service changes an internal column name from “stock_quantity” to “available_stock,” the view definition simply maps the new column back to the original name used externally. Thus, other services’ queries remain unaffected.

However, traditional views execute dynamically at query time—potentially impacting performance for complex queries.

Optimizing Performance Using Materialized Views

Materialized views significantly enhance performance by storing precomputed query results physically within the database. Unlike regular views that execute dynamically each time they’re accessed, materialized views provide rapid retrieval of complex query results without repeated recomputation.

Traditional materialized views often require manual refreshes or full recomputation upon updates—leading to stale results between refreshes and unnecessary resource usage. Incremental view maintenance addresses these limitations by applying only necessary changes (inserts, updates, deletes) continuously as they occur in source data.

Incrementally maintained materialized views thus offer:

• Faster access even for complex queries.
• Real-time freshness of data.
• Reduced computational overhead compared to full recomputation.

This approach enables teams to expose stable interfaces as explicit “data products,” carefully designed for external consumption while maintaining high performance and consistency.

Ensuring Workload Isolation through Shared Storage

Despite their advantages, materialized views alone don’t guarantee workload isolation—resource-intensive queries could still impact overall system performance. To achieve true isolation between workloads (e.g., analytical vs operational queries), modern architectures separate storage from compute resources.

Systems like Snowflake and Apache Spark exemplify this pattern: multiple compute clusters operate independently on shared object storage without resource contention. Applying this concept to incrementally maintained materialized views means storing precomputed results in shared storage accessible by isolated compute clusters dedicated per team or workload type.

In this architecture:

• Resource-intensive analytical queries run on isolated clusters without affecting operational workloads.
• Critical operational queries (e.g., inventory checks) remain unaffected by resource-heavy analytics tasks.
• Scalability and independence of microservices are preserved alongside simplified centralized data access.

Practical Implementation with Materialize

Materialize provides a concrete implementation of this modern architectural pattern—a centralized operational data store designed explicitly for microservices environments. It offers native connectors for databases and message queues alongside incrementally maintained materialized views with strict serializability guarantees.

Using Materialize:

• Services consume change-data-capture (CDC) events directly from source databases.
• Incremental materialized views consolidate real-time updates into stable “data products.”
• Teams query live data products using standard SQL without worrying about eventual consistency or complex integrations.
• Analysts easily combine multiple data products into derived insights without impacting core operational workloads.
• Workload isolation is ensured through separated storage-compute layers.

Materialize integrates seamlessly into existing microservices architectures—teams can start small by exposing select datasets as incrementally maintained materialized views while leaving most incumbent services unchanged initially.

For instance:

• An inventory service continues publishing updates via message queues.
• Instead of each consumer rebuilding inventory state individually from raw events, the inventory team defines a single incrementally maintained materialized view consolidating current stock levels accessible centrally.
• Other services query this centralized view directly via SQL—simplifying integrations dramatically without altering original event-driven workflows significantly.

Conclusion: The Future of Microservice Data Integration

Adopting incrementally maintained materialized views within centralized databases preserves microservices’ core benefits—modularity, scalability, agility—while drastically simplifying cross-service data integration workflows. By leveraging stable interfaces (views), optimized performance (materialized views), and workload isolation (shared storage), teams can achieve efficient real-time data sharing without compromising autonomy or scalability.

Ultimately, technologies like Materialize empower organizations to streamline complex microservices interactions while unlocking valuable real-time insights with minimal overhead—redefining what’s possible in modern software architecture design.

Read more such articles from our Newsletter here.