Microservices have become a popular approach for building scalable, maintainable back ends that can evolve quickly as business needs change. Instead of relying on a single monolithic server, a microservices architecture organizes functionality into multiple, independent services that communicate with each other. This separation of concerns improves flexibility, fault isolation, and the ability to scale specific parts of a system without affecting the rest.
In this guide, a Ruby-focused perspective is used to walk through how such an architecture can be set up. The focus is on a broker-based design and a concrete, working example that developers can adapt for their own systems. The example covers setting up a message broker, wiring a Ruby microservice to it, and structuring the code with clear boundaries between data access, business logic, and external interfaces.
Understanding Microservices and the Broker Pattern
In a traditional client-server application, the back end is typically a monolithic system that contains all domain logic and data access. Clients talk to this single back end over an API layer. In a microservices architecture, the monolith is decomposed into smaller services, each owning its own domain and resources. These services collaborate to fulfill requests, but are deployed and scaled independently.
One common way to enable communication between services is through a broker architecture. In this pattern, all services connect to a central messaging component (the broker). Services send messages to the broker, which is responsible for routing them to the appropriate destinations. This design means services do not need to know about each other directly; they only need to know how to talk to the broker. It simplifies service isolation and allows for features like buffering messages when a target service is temporarily unavailable.
Messaging and Communication Basics
To enable this broker-based communication, an asynchronous messaging layer is used. The messaging stack abstracts away transport details and provides support for multipart, asynchronous messages. Services send requests through the broker and receive responses in a way that resembles HTTP semantics (including status codes), but with the added benefits of decoupled, message-driven architecture.
In practice, this setup allows services to focus strictly on their own responsibilities. A single service can register itself with the broker, send regular heartbeat messages to signal that it is alive, and expose operations that other parts of the system can consume. A simple test client can then send requests through the broker and receive responses, illustrating end-to-end behavior.
Building a Ruby Microservice
The example architecture includes three main elements: the broker, one or more Ruby services, and a client. After setting up the broker and verifying that it is running, a Ruby microservice is added to the system using a pre-defined bootstrap structure. This structure offers a clear separation of components and is organized into directories for configuration, data access, domain logic, and service registration.
Within the service project, key files and folders include:
- Configuration files that define broker addresses, logging levels, and database settings.
- Initializers for setting up dependencies such as database connections.
- Data access objects (DAOs) representing database tables.
- Data transfer objects (DTOs) used to represent payloads returned to clients.
- Mappers that convert between DAOs and DTOs.
- Repositories that encapsulate data access operations.
- Service classes that implement business endpoints and orchestrate repositories.
This layout supports clean separation between infrastructure and domain logic while keeping the service focused on a single responsibility.
Example: Implementing a “Person” Service
A concrete example of this architecture is a “Person” service. The setup begins by configuring a database connection and creating a migration to define a persons table. A corresponding DAO model is added to represent records in that table, and a DTO is defined to represent the service’s external payload shape.
A mapper is then introduced to convert between DAO instances and DTO instances. A repository wraps these components, exposing high-level operations like fetching all people from the database. Finally, a service class wires everything together through methods that receive payload and header objects, call the repository, and return structured responses.
For example, a get method on the service might fetch all people. If none are found, it raises an error with an appropriate 404-style status. If records exist, they are converted to DTOs, serialized, and returned to the client. A service registration file then binds the service to the broker, associates routes with methods, and ensures the broker can route incoming requests to the correct handler.
A small client script can be used to exercise this endpoint: it constructs a request, sends it via the broker, and prints the result. Error handling logic can distinguish between “not found” scenarios and unexpected failures by inspecting status codes and messages, making behavior predictable and testable.
Applying the Repository Pattern in Microservices
The architecture outlined above embraces the repository pattern. Services do not directly interact with database models; instead, they depend on repositories, which in turn build on DAOs, DTOs, and mappers. This layering yields several benefits:
- Service classes stay focused on business logic and message handling rather than persistence details.
- Data access concerns are centralized in repositories, simplifying changes to storage or query logic.
- DTOs provide a stable contract for what the service returns, independent of underlying schema changes.
For microservices, this separation is especially valuable. Each service can evolve its storage strategy and internal structure without breaking clients, as long as DTO contracts remain consistent or are versioned thoughtfully. By combining a broker-based messaging design with disciplined patterns like repositories and DTOs, Ruby developers can build microservices that are both flexible and maintainable over time.
Read more such articles from our Newsletter here.
